home

ENGI

video

fastcompany:

If you know anything about robots, or you’re a fan of viral videos on YouTube, you’ll know Keepon. He’s the deceptively simple-looking dancing “toy” that looks like two yellow tennis balls stacked atop each other, standing on a simple black platform and with a rudimentary face even a Muppet would snigger at. But behind the simple facade is a complex of engineering and programming that lets Keepon detect music, and create dance moves that sync perfectly with the beat. He also reacts to touch, and this has been key to therapeutic uses of the little bot that have included helping children with autism understand emotions better.

I’ve been following Keepon ever since it was revealed in 2007, and last week they announced that they’re releasing a consumer version that will cost around $40, which is pretty amazing considering the amount of robotics under its soft rubber body. Compared to the Keepon Pro, which costs $30,000, My Keepon will probably lack the remote control that its more advanced counterpart comes with, and likely contain less expensive optics; but despite this, it’s still going to be very true to the Keepon Pro, and I’m definitely getting one when it comes out.

photo unknownskywalker:

New horizons for Hawking radiation
In 1974, Steven Hawking predicted that black holes were not completely black, but were actually weak emitters of blackbody radiation generated close to the event horizon—the boundary where light is forever trapped by the black hole’s gravitational pull.
Hawking’s insight was to realize how the presence of the horizon could separate virtual photon pairs (constantly being created from the quantum vacuum) such that while one was sucked in, the other could escape, causing the black hole to lose energy.
Hawking’s idea was significant in suggesting a possible optical signature of a black hole’s existence. Yet, even though the prediction created an extensive theoretical literature in cosmology, calculations have since shown that Hawking radiation from black holes is so weak that it would be practically impossible to measure.
It turns out, however, that the physics of how waves interact with a horizon does not depend in a fundamental way on the presence of gravity at all.
In principle, an analogous Hawking radiation should occur in other systems. The key requirement is simply that the interaction between waves and the medium in which they propagate causes there to be a boundary between zones where the wave and the medium have different velocities.
In a paper in Physical Review Letters, Franco Belgiorno at the Università degli Studi di Milano, in collaboration with researchers at several other institutes, also in Italy, describe a series of experiments where high-intensity filaments of light in glass perturb the optical propagation environment in an analogous manner to the way a gravitational field affects light near a black hole horizon.
This perturbation creates the optical equivalent of an event horizon that allows the team to make convincing measurements of analog Hawking radiation at optical frequencies. These results are highly significant in suggesting a system in which Hawking’s prediction can be fully explored in a convenient laboratory environment.
Image: Creating an analog gravitational potential in an optical system. (Left) A suitable change in the index of refraction in a moving medium creates an effective event horizon for photons that propagate with it. As indicated by the pink arrow, photons are forbidden from entering beyond the optical event horizon. The equation below relates the analog black body temperature of the optical white hole to how the change in the index varies in time (τ). (Right) Researchers use a high-intensity light filament to perturb the index of refraction in glass and create an optical event horizon and measure the analog Hawking radiation emerging at right angles from the filament.
• Source: Full article at APS Physics • The paper is available at http://physics.aps.org/pdf/10.1103/

unknownskywalker:

New horizons for Hawking radiation

In 1974, Steven Hawking predicted that black holes were not completely black, but were actually weak emitters of blackbody radiation generated close to the event horizon—the boundary where light is forever trapped by the black hole’s gravitational pull.

Hawking’s insight was to realize how the presence of the horizon could separate virtual photon pairs (constantly being created from the quantum vacuum) such that while one was sucked in, the other could escape, causing the black hole to lose energy.

Hawking’s idea was significant in suggesting a possible optical signature of a black hole’s existence. Yet, even though the prediction created an extensive theoretical literature in cosmology, calculations have since shown that Hawking radiation from black holes is so weak that it would be practically impossible to measure.

It turns out, however, that the physics of how waves interact with a horizon does not depend in a fundamental way on the presence of gravity at all.

In principle, an analogous Hawking radiation should occur in other systems. The key requirement is simply that the interaction between waves and the medium in which they propagate causes there to be a boundary between zones where the wave and the medium have different velocities.

In a paper in Physical Review Letters, Franco Belgiorno at the Università degli Studi di Milano, in collaboration with researchers at several other institutes, also in Italy, describe a series of experiments where high-intensity filaments of light in glass perturb the optical propagation environment in an analogous manner to the way a gravitational field affects light near a black hole horizon.

This perturbation creates the optical equivalent of an event horizon that allows the team to make convincing measurements of analog Hawking radiation at optical frequencies. These results are highly significant in suggesting a system in which Hawking’s prediction can be fully explored in a convenient laboratory environment.

Image: Creating an analog gravitational potential in an optical system. (Left) A suitable change in the index of refraction in a moving medium creates an effective event horizon for photons that propagate with it. As indicated by the pink arrow, photons are forbidden from entering beyond the optical event horizon. The equation below relates the analog black body temperature of the optical white hole to how the change in the index varies in time (τ). (Right) Researchers use a high-intensity light filament to perturb the index of refraction in glass and create an optical event horizon and measure the analog Hawking radiation emerging at right angles from the filament.

• Source: Full article at APS Physics The paper is available at http://physics.aps.org/pdf/10.1103/

1 year ago

November 9, 2010
reblogged via unknownskywalker
text

Daily Friday: A Choice

This week I encountered an interesting situation. I received a letter from the University of California, Merced saying that I had been accepted into their engineering school and that I had to reply by June 16 if I was interested. The strange thing was that I was had never applied for UCM, and what makes this even stranger was that I wasn’t accepted into any of the UCs that I did apply for; so I can only make guesses as to how or why they chose me.

The thought of moving back to California was very appealing; I often wonder what it would be like to live in northern California. I had been to Davis last Thanksgiving to visit family, and it was a serene place that put me at ease with its relatively slow pace compared to Los Angeles or San Diego.

When I first came to Florida, I hated it. I arrived at night by plane* a couple of days before class started, so my room mates hadn’t showed up yet. and I felt sort of foolish for moving to Florida on such a short notice. I slept in an empty dorm suite on top of a spring mattress with no pillows or blankets. I felt sad and alone.

A lot has changed since that night. Despite my expectations, I met people that I could get along with, and I like the professors that I’ve worked with.

Both schools have good programs (albeit UCM only has mechanical engineering and isn’t ABET accredited yet) with research in my field of interests. I’m leaning towards staying in Florida; one, because I think the program is more rigorous and in the end I’ll be more educated, and two, I simply haven’t been here long enough yet. When I thought about the time when I first moved to San Diego, a city which I’ve come to love, I didn’t like it either. I think it would be foolish to cut my time here short on an insecurity like ‘not being in California’ or ‘the people here are weird.’

If it’s one thing I learned from moving out, it’s to go out and explore your environment; something that I’ve been bad about in the past. But I’m slowly learning.

I haven’t completely shut UCM down as a possibility, and since I have a week to think about it, I would appreciate any thoughts or opinions.

*Note: Originally my sister and her husband were going to fly out with me so they could help me move and see the campus, but Delta royally screwed everything up; that’s a story for another time.